Why smart presenters still lose the room

Thoughts From the Corner


Hello Reader,

I was once tasked with presenting my project to a room full of peers. I put together slides — here's what we're doing, here's how we do it, any questions? Nobody asked anything. The room was visibly bored, and half of them were there because they'd been told to show up, the same way I'd been told to present.


I thought at the time it was a bad session — wrong crowd, not enough prep. The real problem was simpler: I'd never answered the question every audience is silently asking from the moment they sit down. Why should I care? Why does this matter to me, in my situation, right now? I could have related the work to the team's bigger goals or shown where our project intersected with theirs. Instead I told them what we were doing, and they sat there waiting for it to end.

video preview

Compare that to a client presentation where the stakes were real. I opened by restating their goal — not our progress update, their goal, in their words — to show we'd kept their vision in front of us the whole time we worked. Then I walked through what we'd built, mapped directly to that goal instead of listed as technical achievements. I showed working material instead of slides describing it, because seeing a thing that exists is different from seeing a slide about it. The room was engaged. People asked real questions, the kind you ask when you're thinking alongside someone rather than politely waiting them out.


Same work, framed two different ways, produces two completely different rooms.


Before I build a single slide now, I work through what I call the meta presentation. Who's actually going to be in that room, including the person I'm not expecting? What do they already know, so I can pitch the content at the right level instead of wasting their time or losing them? And the question that does the real work: what's our shared interest in this topic, and why does it matter to them specifically, right now, not in the abstract? Answer that before the outline exists, and you already know how to open and which parts of your content to lean on. Skip it, and you find out you had work to do three minutes into the presentation, watching the room check out in real time.


It takes about ten minutes. It saves the whole presentation.

If you've been in that room — as the presenter or the audience — I'd like to hear what the moment was when you realized nobody was invested. Hit reply.

Was this helpful? Any requests? I’d love to hear from you! I read all emails personally.

Until next time!

—Chris


I appreciate the DIY mindset, which is why I offer so much content for free. If need to accelerate your growth, or want personalized assistance, I have a limited number of one-on-one coaching spots available.


Unsubscribe · Preferences

Chris In Your Corner

I spent most of my career in environments where technical excellence was table stakes — nuclear submarines, cybersecurity, software engineering, management. What I kept noticing was that the people who stalled weren't the ones who couldn't do the work. They were the ones who couldn't navigate the people around the work. That pattern eventually drove me to this work. If you're a technical professional hitting a ceiling you didn't expect — not a skills ceiling, but a people one — you probably know what I mean. Your work is solid but it's not landing. Influence feels like a foreign language. You got into this field partly to avoid the politics, and now the politics are everywhere. I'm not going to tell you to become someone you're not. I didn't. But I did change how I show up. Now I often work outside my comfort zone. It's more rewarding than anything I was doing before. If that sounds like where you want to be, you're in the right place.